“Impact Evaluations: Can we learn more? Better?" conference was just co-hosted by the Center for Global Development and the International Initiative for Impact Evaluation (3ie). The conference was an opportunity to take stock of the current
production of studies that aim to attribute changes in outcomes to
particular interventions. In 2006, the Center published a working group report
which argued that too few good quality impact evaluations were being
conducted, what it called an “evaluation gap.”
In response to that
report, 3ie was created in 2009.
Now, four years later, the time is ripe to look at what has
happened and consider what else might be done to make sure good evidence
is available and used in improving public policy. There is a great deal more good research being done. The number of
impact evaluations being published has more than tripled between 2007
and 2011. The total, about 120 in 2011, is still far less than is
probably needed if you consider that there are more than 100 countries
working in more than a dozen sectors with numerous interventions worth
assessing.
Details on the quality of the increase of evaluation are detailed in this CGD article.
